Ordinary people campaigning for appropriate development in Oldfield Park

43 Upper Oldfield Park - old proposal returns

Developers have resubmitted an old proposal to demolish the house at 43 Upper Oldfield Park and build a block of luxury flats instead.

This is despite the original submission being refused because it would have a detrimental impact on the Conservation Area and World Heritage Site and having had a more recent application granted.

We stopped it once before. Together we can stop it again.



Please submit your comments online
(if you wish to object, don't forget to change the Nature of Submission from Comment to Objection]

or in writing to:

Mark Reynolds, Case Officer, Planning Services, Trimbridge House, Trim Street, Bath BA1 2DP
tel. 01225 477 079

Also, let your Councillors know what you think: Your Councillors' details

Further information at the bottom of this page

Previously refused

In 2007, the Council's Development Control Committee decided that:

The proposed development, by reason of its inappropriate design, incorporating a predominance of flat roofs, would be incongruous in this prominent location and out of character within its context. This would be harmful to the character and appearance of this part of the Conservation Area and World Heritage Site.

The Committee vote was 10 against, none in favour and 2 abstentions. Nothing has changed that gives grounds for altering the Committee's decision.

It's the same - inappropriate & incongruous

back to top

The story so far...

43 upper oldfield park, view from junction road 43 Upper Oldfield Park failed application 43 Upper Oldfield Park failed proposal 2 3rd proposal for 43 Upper Oldfield Park

 

Hayesfield School - a contrast

The developers of 43 Upper Oldfield Park argue that the nearby Hayesfield School development means their proposal for a block of flats should be given approval. This is clearly a nonsense:

Nevertheless, the comparison is enlightening:

To add your support & further information

back to top